Lyssa Ling

[ GATEHOUSE 24 ]

:: start 184302 +000000
:: start 185212 +000000
:: archive location { dev 4 }
:: index { no }
:: retention { 1 }
:: processing time { 0.48 }
::

A
// labeled A;
// triangulated location mapped;
// passive badge { present }
// badge query { ling, s {995ae} }

Waiting long [,] sis [?]

// not yet reviewed

B
// labeled B;
// triangulated location mapped;
// passive badge { present }
// badge query { ling, l {640ea} }

Oh [!] You surprised me.

// not yet reviewed
// 15% positive emotional state
// cross reference surveillance footage

{ extrapolated: badge {line 16} extracted }

{ gatekeeper system 24;
active badge interrogated, passed }


LING, S
Are you mooning on about James again [?]

// not yet reviewed

LING, L
I was thinking about [.] You know [,] them [.]

// not yet reviewed

LING, S
Yeah [?]

// not yet reviewed

[ LOG EXCERPT ENDS ]

And from 6290435729.cache we know that Lyssa Ling was around the security sytems, and she was "surprised" - rather interrupted - when sy walked up to her. So what do you think, is it possible, that she was one of the thieves?

Darun
Greenhorn


Joined: 18 Mar 2005
Posts: 4

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 3:45 pm Post subject:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From the first time I read the security logs and internal emails, Lyssa has been my prime suspect.

1. Her sister works the security gate, which gives her a bit of inside knowledge regarding the security procedures.
2. The gatekeeper system assessed her as having a 15% positive emotional state - even Henrik, with Sente breathing down his neck, had an 89% positive state.
3. She was distracted when her sister let her in, claiming she was thinking about "them" (us?).
4. In the friendly emailing back and forth about the shoes, she was the only one who didn't contribute to the conversation.
5. When Henrik warned Sarah about not shutting the equipment down properly, she says that Lyssa was also running tests at the time. Telling Henrik to check the logs suggests she is confident of her innocence, leaving Lyssa as the probable culprit.

I think Lyssa had both the means and the opportunity. As for motive, that's anyone's guess.